LinaHistory & heritageArchives · culture · people · places
An educational initiative ofThe Virtual Embassy of Iraq in IsraelIndependent civic education · Learning & Civic Education
Learning & civic education
THE LEARNING CENTER
Understand the facts.
Build your perspective.
Be part of the future.
Short, clear modules on shared history, diplomacy, peace agreements, post-treaty implementation, the Abraham Accords and civic dialogue—built for curious learners.
Deep dive · Interactive guide
The Abrahamic Movement in Iraq
Explore the Movement’s Iraq work through faith, shared Abrahamic heritage, civic dialogue, the Abraham Accords connection and The Virtual Embassy of Iraq in Israel’s international room.
1
Shared history
Why Iraqi Jewish heritage matters to understanding the region.
Learn more →
2
Diplomacy basics
Official relations, normalization, Track II and civic diplomacy.
Learn more →
3
How Peace Agreements Work
Ceasefires, treaties, legal approval, implementation and monitoring—without treating them as the same thing.
Learn more →
4
Abraham Accords
How the agreements began, expanded and changed regional diplomacy.
Learn more →
5
The Abrahamic Movement
Explore the civic and interfaith movement, including its Iraq chapter and people-to-people approach.
Learn more →
6
What Happens After a Treaty Is Signed?
How entry into force, domestic steps, implementation bodies, monitoring and review turn a signed text into practice.
Learn more →Meet your learning guides
Four recurring guides help connect history, diplomacy, regional affairs and civic dialogue.
AdamDiplomacyEmbassies · relations · agreements
NoorRegional affairsAbraham Accords · timeline · countries
DanielCivic dialoguePeople · dialogue · civic initiatives
Key milestones
2020
The Abraham Accords begin
Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain signed the first Abraham Accords agreements in September 2020. Morocco followed in December 2020 and Sudan signed the declaration in January 2021.
2022
Iraq adopts a law criminalizing normalization
Iraq’s Official Gazette published Law No. 1 of 2022, which prohibits and criminalizes normalization and the establishment of relations with Israel. This legal context is essential when discussing Iraqi official policy.
2025
Kazakhstan announces accession to the Abraham Accords
Kazakhstan joined the framework in a different way from the original normalization cases: it had already maintained diplomatic relations with Israel since 1992.
Today
Different layers must be kept distinct
Official diplomacy, domestic law, historical heritage, public opinion and independent civic dialogue are separate layers. Understanding the region means not collapsing them into one category.
1. Which statement is accurate?
2. What best describes Track II diplomacy?
3. Why is Iraqi Jewish heritage relevant to this subject?
Interactive learning tools
Try it yourself
Three quick ways to turn reading into practice.
Timeline challenge
Tap the years from earliest to latest.
Choose the earliest event first.
True or false
Track II diplomacy is the same as official government negotiation.
Choose your level
See the same idea explained at different depths.
What is normalization?When two countries move from little or no official relationship toward ordinary official relations.
A process of establishing or expanding diplomatic, travel, economic and other official ties after non-recognition, rupture or hostility.
A political and legal process whose content depends on the bilateral agreements involved; it may include recognition, diplomatic missions, aviation, trade, security coordination and sector-specific agreements.
Module 1 · Shared history
A relationship is more than governments
Iraq and Israel do not have formal diplomatic relations, but the human history connecting the societies is much older and more complex than modern state-to-state politics.
Three windows into Iraqi Jewish history
Deep roots
Jewish communities in Mesopotamia developed religious, intellectual and communal traditions over many centuries, making the region one of the historic centers of Jewish life.
Cities and everyday life
In modern Iraq, Jewish communities were especially visible in Baghdad and also lived in Basra, Mosul and other cities, participating in commerce, education, music and the professions.
An archive rescued
The Iraqi Jewish Archive, discovered in Baghdad in 2003, preserves thousands of books and tens of thousands of documents illuminating schools, families, institutions and daily life.
Iraqi Jewish life is part of Iraqi history
Jewish communities lived in Mesopotamia for more than two millennia. In the modern era, Iraqi Jews were active in commerce, public life, education, music and the professions. The U.S. National Archives estimates that about 130,000 Jews lived in Iraq by 1949, primarily in Baghdad, Basra and Mosul.
Historic interior of the Great Synagogue of Baghdad. Public-domain image; source: Wikimedia Commons / Babylonian Jewry Heritage Center.Build the timeline
Select a lens to see how heritage, conflict, law and diplomacy overlap without becoming the same story.
c. 6th century BCE
Jewish communities in Mesopotamia
After the Babylonian exile, Jewish religious and intellectual life developed deeply in Mesopotamia. The region later became a major center of Jewish scholarship.
Early 20th century
A large, visible Iraqi Jewish community
Jewish Iraqis participated in urban economic, cultural and professional life. Archival records preserve schools, hospitals, communal institutions and family histories.
1948
War and the absence of diplomatic relations
Iraq participated in the 1948 Arab–Israeli war. Iraq and Israel did not establish diplomatic relations after Israel’s creation.
1950–1951
A major transformation of Iraqi Jewish life
Most of Iraq’s Jewish population left the country during the early 1950s, many settling in Israel. The migration reshaped both Iraqi society and communities in Israel.
2003
The Iraqi Jewish Archive is discovered
More than 2,700 books and tens of thousands of documents were found in Baghdad and later conserved and digitized by the U.S. National Archives and partners.
2020
The Abraham Accords begin
Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain signed the first Abraham Accords agreements in September 2020. Morocco followed in December 2020 and Sudan signed the declaration in January 2021.
2022
Iraq adopts a law criminalizing normalization
Iraq’s Official Gazette published Law No. 1 of 2022, which prohibits and criminalizes normalization and the establishment of relations with Israel. This legal context is essential when discussing Iraqi official policy.
2025
Kazakhstan announces accession to the Abraham Accords
Kazakhstan joined the framework in a different way from the original normalization cases: it had already maintained diplomatic relations with Israel since 1992.
Today
Different layers must be kept distinct
Official diplomacy, domestic law, historical heritage, public opinion and independent civic dialogue are separate layers. Understanding the region means not collapsing them into one category.
Module 2 · Diplomacy basics
Learn the vocabulary before debating the politics
Many arguments become confusing because different kinds of relationships are treated as synonyms. Open each concept and test the distinction.
How diplomacy can develop
Not every relationship follows every step, but this sequence helps explain how contact can grow into formal cooperation.
Contact
Dialogue
Confidence
Cooperation
Agreement
What an embassy typically does
Represent
Communicates a government’s official positions and represents the state abroad.
Connect
Builds working relationships with institutions, communities, business, academia and culture.
Consular work
Many missions assist citizens and travelers, depending on their mandate and local arrangements.
Report
Diplomats observe political, economic and social developments and report to their governments.
Government levelDiplomatic relations
＋
Formal state-to-state relations, normally involving official recognition, embassies or accredited representatives.
State policyNormalization
＋
A process in which states establish or expand ordinary diplomatic, economic, travel or other formal relations after a period of non-recognition or hostility.
Unofficial dialogueTrack II diplomacy
＋
Unofficial dialogue among experts, academics, former officials, civil society or other non-governmental participants. It can explore ideas but does not itself create official state policy.
Civil societyCivic diplomacy
＋
People-to-people engagement intended to improve understanding or cooperation outside formal government diplomacy.
Long-term processPeacebuilding
＋
Long-term work that can include dialogue, education, institutions, reconciliation, economic cooperation and efforts to reduce drivers of conflict.
Culture & memoryHeritage dialogue
＋
Using history, archives, culture and shared memory to understand communities and recover connections that politics may obscure.
Module 3 · How Peace Agreements Work
From stopping the fighting to sustaining an agreement
Peace processes use several different instruments. A ceasefire, an armistice, a peace treaty, normalization and long-term peacebuilding can be connected—but they do not mean the same thing, and there is no single sequence that every conflict follows.
The 60-second answer
A signed document is one milestone, not the whole process. Parties may first reduce violence, negotiate substantive issues, write commitments, obtain any required legal approval, bring the agreement into force, implement it and create ways to monitor compliance or resolve disputes. Some stages overlap, repeat or never occur.
A common pathway
Eight moves from contact to implementation
Real negotiations are rarely linear. This sequence is a learning model for reading the process.
Contact
Direct talks, intermediaries or mediators open a channel and test whether negotiation is possible.
Agenda & confidence
The parties identify issues, procedures and practical steps that may make talks workable.
Negotiation
They bargain over the issues in dispute and over the obligations each side would accept.
Drafting
Negotiators and lawyers convert political understandings into defined commitments, timelines and procedures.
Signature
Authorized representatives sign. Whether signature itself creates binding consent depends on the agreement and the applicable legal process.
Approval & entry into force
Some treaties require ratification, acceptance or approval before they become legally operative; others may take effect by signature under their terms.
Implementation
Institutions carry out what was agreed: schedules, security arrangements, legal changes, exchanges, cooperation or other obligations.
Monitoring & peacebuilding
Verification, dispute procedures, communication and longer-term institution-building can help manage compliance and future disagreements.
Important: ceasefire negotiations can happen before, during or after wider political talks. The United Nations emphasizes that there is no universal template for ceasefire agreements.
Know the instrument
Not all agreements do the same job
The label matters less than the actual text, parties, obligations and legal effect.
Ceasefire
An agreement or arrangement to stop or reduce fighting under stated terms. It may be temporary, local or broader, and it can create space for political talks without settling the underlying conflict.
Look for: duration · geographic scope · prohibited acts · monitoringArmistice
A military agreement suspending active hostilities. Under the law of armed conflict, an armistice does not by itself necessarily end the legal state of war.
Look for: military lines · suspension terms · notice · violationsPeace treaty / comprehensive settlement
A broader settlement can address the relationship between the parties and the issues needed to end or transform a conflict. When the instrument is a treaty between states, its legal effect depends on its terms and the law of treaties.
Look for: parties · obligations · entry into force · dispute proceduresNormalization
The establishment or expansion of ordinary official relations between states. It may accompany a peace treaty, follow one, or occur through a different diplomatic instrument.
Look for: recognition · diplomatic missions · travel · trade · sector agreementsCartoon explainer
Two mistakes to avoid
Headline decoder
What does the verb actually prove?
Open each card before treating a headline as evidence of a completed peace process.
Stage“Talks opened”
＋
A channel exists. It does not tell you that the parties have agreed on substance.
Instrument“Ceasefire agreed”
＋
The parties have accepted rules for stopping or reducing hostilities. Read the scope, start time, duration, monitoring and exceptions.
Legal step“Treaty signed”
＋
Signature is important, but it is not automatically the same as entry into force. Some treaties make signature binding; others require ratification, acceptance or approval.
Legal effect“Entered into force”
＋
The treaty has reached the point specified for its legal operation. That still leaves the practical question of implementation.
Practice“Implementation began”
＋
The parties are carrying out agreed obligations. Different provisions can have different timelines and responsible institutions.
Accountability“Monitoring mechanism established”
＋
A system exists to observe, verify or report on compliance. Its mandate, access, composition and reporting rules determine what it can actually establish.
Who are the parties?
Identify exactly who signed and who is covered by the commitments.
What must they do?
Separate broad principles from specific obligations, deadlines and geographic scope.
When does it operate?
Check the start time, entry-into-force clause, duration and any review dates.
Who checks compliance?
Look for monitoring, verification, reporting and access arrangements.
What if there is a dispute?
Find consultation, mediation, arbitration, joint committees or other procedures.
What happens next?
Implementation plans, domestic measures and follow-up institutions often determine what the document changes in practice.
Primary references for this lesson: UN DPPA Guidance on Mediation of Ceasefires ↗ · ICRC: Armistice ↗ · Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties ↗
Remember
A ceasefire, armistice, peace treaty and normalization are different instruments.
Understand
Signing, legal entry into force and practical implementation are separate questions.
Explore next
Next: apply these distinctions to the Abraham Accords and other diplomatic agreements.
Module 4 · Abraham Accords
How the Abraham Accords began, expanded and changed regional diplomacy
The Abraham Accords are best learned as a sequence of real diplomatic steps: breakthrough announcements, signed agreements, restored official relations, new cooperation—and later accession by a country that already had relations with Israel.
Five participation paths
The framework grew through different legal and diplomatic routes rather than one identical document.
United Arab Emirates
2020 treaty establishing peace, diplomatic relations and full normalization.
Bahrain
2020 declaration establishing peace and diplomatic relations.
Morocco
2020 joint declaration restoring and expanding official relations.
Sudan
Signed the Abraham Accords Declaration in 2021; later instability complicated full implementation.
Kazakhstan
Announced accession in 2025 after decades of existing diplomatic relations with Israel.
2020 · The breakthrough
On 13 August 2020, Israel and the United Arab Emirates announced a move toward full normalization. Bahrain announced its own normalization track on 11 September.
Opening agreements15 September 2020 · The signing
At the White House, Israel and the UAE signed a treaty of peace, diplomatic relations and full normalization. Israel and Bahrain signed a declaration of peace and diplomatic relations, alongside the Abraham Accords Declaration.
Washington signing2020–2021 · Morocco and Sudan
Morocco, Israel and the United States signed a joint declaration in Rabat on 22 December 2020. Sudan signed the Abraham Accords Declaration in January 2021, although later instability and war complicated full bilateral implementation.
Different legal paths2025 · Kazakhstan accedes
Kazakhstan announced accession to the Abraham Accords in November 2025. This was different from the original normalization cases because Kazakhstan and Israel had already maintained diplomatic relations since 1992.
Later accessionWhat did The Abraham Accords make possible?
Formal state-to-state relations can support embassies, official visits, direct communication and agreements between ministries.
Depending on the bilateral relationship, normalization can open direct flights, tourism, business, investment and commercial ties.
Participants have pursued cooperation in areas such as technology, health, water, energy, finance, research and security policy.
Important limit: the Abraham Accords did not by themselves resolve the Israeli–Palestinian conflict or every regional dispute. They changed relations between participating states. Iraq is not a signatory, and Iraqi law currently criminalizes normalization with Israel.
Module 5 · The Abrahamic Movement
A civic and interfaith network built around dialogue, shared heritage and people-to-people peace
The Abrahamic Movement in Iraq is a featured civic and interfaith initiative of The Virtual Embassy of Iraq in Israel, not a treaty or government program. Through the Embassy platform, we carry Iraq-rooted civic dialogue into the international room through Track II diplomacy, multilingual public diplomacy, heritage, international partnerships and people-to-people outreach.
From conversation to civic cooperation
A simple way to understand how people-to-people initiatives can develop.
Listen
Dialogue
Learn
Collaborate
Where civic initiatives can work
Education & dialogue
Seminars, learning programs and exchanges can create spaces for participants to encounter new ideas and one another.
Heritage & culture
Shared stories, archives, music, places and memory can become starting points for conversation.
Community networks
Civil-society relationships can connect educators, professionals, religious figures and community organizers across boundaries.
Why the name “Abrahamic”?
The movement uses Abraham/Ibrahim as a shared point of reference across Judaism, Christianity and Islam, with the aim of creating space for cooperation without asking communities to erase their differences.
Source: The Abrahamic Movement’s own public materialsThe Iraq chapter
What the movement says it is trying to build in Iraq.
Dialogue
Religious and civic conversation
The chapter describes work with Sunni, Shiite and Sufi communities and frames interfaith engagement as part of Iraq’s own religious and social history.
Education
Seminars and community engagement
Its stated approach includes educational activity for professionals and students, with an emphasis on moderation and resisting sectarian extremism.
Peace
Diplomacy from below
The movement presents civil society as a place where relationships can be built before—or even when—formal state diplomacy is absent.
Open the full Abrahamic Movement in Iraq interactive guide →
Module 6 · After the signature
A signature is a milestone—not the finish line
What happens next depends on the treaty itself and the parties’ legal procedures. Some treaties can become binding through signature; others require ratification, approval, acceptance, an exchange of notifications or another agreed step before entry into force.
The 60-second answer
After signature, negotiators and governments usually shift from making promises to managing legal effect and performance. The treaty may set conditions for entry into force. Once binding, implementation can require domestic legal or administrative action, joint bodies, budgets, security arrangements, diplomatic channels, technical work, monitoring and dispute-resolution procedures. A signed document can therefore be only the beginning of a much longer implementation phase.
THE IMPLEMENTATION MAP
Eight jobs that can begin after signature
The exact sequence varies. Read the treaty first: it tells you which steps apply and when.
Check legal status
Does signature itself express consent to be bound, or is ratification, approval, acceptance or another step required?
Reach entry into force
The treaty’s final clauses normally specify when it becomes legally operative for the parties.
Complete domestic steps
States may need legislation, regulations, budgets, executive decisions or administrative instructions to carry out commitments.
Build implementation machinery
Joint commissions, liaison offices, secretariats, technical groups and named contact points can turn broad commitments into scheduled work.
Carry out practical obligations
Depending on the treaty: security arrangements, border procedures, diplomatic representation, transport, trade, water, infrastructure or other agreed measures.
Monitor and verify
The parties—or agreed third parties—may collect data, inspect, observe and publish reports on whether commitments are being performed.
Resolve disputes
Treaties may provide consultation, joint committees, mediation, arbitration, courts or other procedures for disagreements about interpretation or performance.
Review and adapt
Periodic reviews can identify delays, update timetables, adopt protocols or adjust implementation while keeping the underlying commitments clear.
Four milestones people often confuse
A headline can describe one milestone while readers assume another. Keep these separate.
✍
Signed
Authorized representatives signed the text.
This does not by itself tell you whether the treaty is already in force.⚖
In force
The treaty’s agreed legal conditions for entry into force have been satisfied.
A treaty in force is binding on its parties and must be performed in good faith.⚙
Implemented
The parties are actually carrying out the obligations.
Implementation may be partial, phased, delayed or ongoing.🔎
Monitored
Performance is being checked through reports, observers, data or agreed verification mechanisms.
Monitoring describes how compliance is assessed; it is not a substitute for implementation.Implementation Lab
Read each situation and identify what has actually happened—not what you hope happens next.
Two governments sign a treaty. The text says it enters into force only after they exchange instruments of ratification. That exchange has not happened yet.
A treaty is in force. A joint border commission is meeting, new crossing procedures are operating, and the required monthly reports are being filed.
The parties disagree about one clause and send the issue to the consultation mechanism created by the treaty.
Implementation is more than diplomacy
A treaty can create work across several systems at once.
Law
Ratification, legislation, regulations and legal authority.
Institutions
Commissions, ministries, budgets, staffing and timelines.
Security
Ceasefire lines, force arrangements, borders, verification or other agreed measures.
Diplomacy
Direct channels, representation, working groups and formal consultations.
Daily life
Travel, transport, commerce, infrastructure, services or other practical commitments.
Accountability
Reports, review meetings, data, inspections and dispute procedures.
Five questions for reading implementation news
Is the treaty in force?
Do not infer legal effect from the signing date alone.
Which obligation is due now?
Look for deadlines, phases and conditions.
Who is responsible?
Identify the ministry, commission, security body or other actor named in the text.
What evidence shows performance?
Look for enacted measures, opened institutions, verified actions or published reports.
What happens if there is disagreement?
Find the consultation, review or dispute-settlement clause.
Legal anchor: the UN Treaty Collection explains ratification and entry into force; Article 26 of the Vienna Convention states that treaties in force are binding and must be performed in good faith. Peace agreements can also establish implementation timetables, follow-up commissions and verification mechanisms.
Knowledge check
Can you separate history, diplomacy, agreements and advocacy?
Eight questions. Your score stays in your browser; nothing is submitted.
1. Which statement is accurate?
2. What best describes Track II diplomacy?
3. Why is Iraqi Jewish heritage relevant to this subject?
4. What makes Kazakhstan’s 2025 Abraham Accords accession different?
5. Which statement best describes an armistice?
6. Does signing a treaty always mean it has entered into force?
7. A treaty is signed but its text requires ratification before entry into force. Ratification has not happened. What is the most accurate description?
8. Which is the clearest evidence that treaty implementation is underway?
Knowledge Check · The Learning CenterThe Virtual Embassy of Iraq in IsraelLearn · Understand · Connect
Reference desk
Search the glossary
Use precise language. Search a term or browse all definitions.
Ceasefire
An agreement or arrangement to stop or reduce hostilities under specified terms. Ceasefires vary in duration, geographic scope, purpose and monitoring arrangements.
Armistice
A military agreement suspending active hostilities between belligerents. It does not by itself necessarily end the legal state of war.
Peace treaty
A treaty intended to establish a formal legal settlement between states after conflict. Its obligations and legal effect depend on the text and applicable treaty law.
Ratification
A formal act by which a state expresses consent to be bound by a treaty when ratification is required by the treaty or the negotiating states’ agreement.
Entry into force
The point at which a treaty becomes legally operative according to the conditions set out in the treaty or otherwise agreed by the parties.
Monitoring and verification
Arrangements for observing, checking and reporting whether parties are carrying out agreed commitments, especially common in ceasefire and security arrangements.
Abraham Accords
A set/framework of normalization agreements and declarations beginning in 2020 between Israel and participating Arab states.
Abrahamic dialogue
Interfaith or intercultural engagement among communities associated with Abrahamic religious traditions.
Civic diplomacy
Non-governmental, people-to-people activity intended to improve communication and understanding across borders.
Diplomatic relations
Formal relations between states, often including mutual recognition, embassies or accredited diplomatic representation.
Normalization
The establishment or expansion of ordinary official relations between states after non-recognition, rupture or hostility.
Peacebuilding
Long-term efforts to reduce conflict drivers and strengthen relationships, institutions and conditions for sustainable peace.
Track I diplomacy
Official diplomacy conducted by governments and authorized representatives.
Track II diplomacy
Unofficial dialogue involving civil society, experts, academics, former officials or other non-governmental participants.
Iraqi Jewish heritage
The religious, cultural, social, archival and historical legacy of Jewish communities that lived in Iraq for many centuries.
Primary source
Original evidence such as a law, treaty, archival document, official record, speech, photograph or contemporaneous record.
Secondary source
Analysis or reporting that interprets, contextualizes or synthesizes primary evidence.
Civic initiative
An independent non-governmental effort organized by individuals or civil society rather than a state authority.
Treaty implementation
The legal, administrative, institutional and practical measures through which parties carry out the obligations of a treaty.
Joint commission
A body established by an agreement to coordinate, supervise, review or help resolve issues arising during implementation.
Provisional application
Application of a treaty, or part of it, before formal entry into force when the treaty or negotiating states so provide.
Treaty registration
The registration of a treaty or international agreement with the United Nations Secretariat under Article 102 of the UN Charter after it has entered into force.
No matching terms.
Source room
Start with primary and institutional sources
This learning page is designed to send you outward to evidence. Open the documents, inspect context and compare interpretations.
Legal and political conditions can change. For current legal status, consult the latest official Iraqi sources rather than relying on summaries.
Keep learning
Move from concepts to original records and long-form analysis.